[Implementation of teleconsultation in hospitals in the city of Cordoba during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic] / Implementación de la teleconsulta en hospitales de Córdoba Capital durante la pandemia de SARS-CoV-2.

Teleconsultation is one of the assets of telemedicine that allows medical professionals to provide diagnostic or therapeutic advice to patients through electronic means. The objective of this study was to estimate the frequency of teleconsultation implementation in hospitals in the city of Cordoba from 2020 to 2022. A descriptive, observational and cross-sectional study was carried out, providing an online survey (Google Forms) to hospital representatives in Córdoba. Descriptive statistics were used. The study was conducted in 30 out of the 50 hospitals in the city, including 17 private (57%) and 13 public institutions (43%). Teleconsultation was provided by a higher percentage of private healthcare facilities (82%) compared to public ones (77%). The results showed that the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic was the main driver behind the implementation of teleconsultation, with 92% of all hospitals having implemented it due to the pandemic while the remaining 8% had already offered this service prior to the pandemic. The most requested services were Internal Medicine and Infectology, and phone calls were the most commonly used tool. Among the hospitals that did not offer teleconsultation, 67% did not plan to do so in the future, while the remaining 33% were making arrangements for its implementation in 2023. Although the pandemic catalyzed the implementation of teleconsultations in most hospitals, there are still some institutions that do not plan to incorporate this modality. This study provides valuable data for improving future medical care strategies in the city of Cordoba.

La teleconsulta es una de las prestaciones de la telemedicina, definida como el conjunto de interacciones médico-paciente cuyo fin es el de proporcionar asesoramiento diagnóstico o terapéutico a través de medios electrónicos. El objetivo principal del presente trabajo es estimar la frecuencia de la implementación de la teleconsulta en hospitales de la ciudad de Córdoba durante el periodo 2020-2022. Se realizó un estudio descriptivo, observacional y transversal, brindando una encuesta online (Google Forms) a directivos de los hospitales de Córdoba Capital. Se utilizaron estadísticos descriptivos. Se pudo entrevistar a 30 representantes de los 50 nosocomios que tenía la ciudad, de los cuales 17 eran privados (57%) y 13 públicos (43%). El 82% de los privados ofrecía teleconsulta versus 77% de los públicos. El 92% del total la implementó por la pandemia de SARS-CoV-2 y el otro 8% la ofrecía previamente. Los servicios más demandados fueron Clínica Médica e Infectología. La llamada telefónica fue la herramienta más utilizada. Sobre los nosocomios que no ofrecieron teleconsulta, 67% no planea hacerlo a futuro, y el resto está realizando gestiones para su aplicación en el 2023. La pandemia de SARS-CoV-2 catalizó la implementación de teleconsultas en la mayoría de los hospitales relevados. A pesar de aumentar la accesibilidad a la consulta, aún hay algunos hospitales que no planean incorporar esta modalidad. Contar con estos datos puede constituir una base para mejorar estrategias futuras de atención médica en la ciudad de Córdoba.

Physicians' health care / [El cuidado de la salud de los médicos.]

Introduction: The programs of the Medicine Careers of Córdoba do not describe aspects related to the management of the doctor-patient relationship when the patient is a colleague. The main objective is to describe these aspects. Material and methods: An observational, prospective, cross-sectional and analytical study was carried out. A validated survey was sent by email to doctors in Córdoba, Argentina. Results: Of the 225 physicians who responded, 76% did not have a family doctor. The youngest and those who attend in the public sphere made up this group (p<0,0002 and p<0.04 respectively). 86,2% self-medicated in the last year. Self-medication was more frequent among young physicians (p<0,0008) and with fewer years of professional practice (p<0,003). This group, regardless of whether they worked in the public or private sphere, continued to work despite having some disease and although they could have requested sick leave. The oldest doctors (p<0,0002) and with more than 25 years of professional practice experienced assisting colleagues (p<0,0002). 74,2% did not modify clinical care, but 82,7% answered that at some point they did commit more than usual. Conclusion: Young doctors do not have a family doctor, resort to self-medication, request less sick leave, even though they need it, and have little experience treating colleagues. Content should be incorporated during undergraduate and graduate medicine training that address the risks of illness and self-medication for physicians, how to seek the best care for their own health and that of their colleague.

Introducción: Los programas de las Carreras de Medicina de Córdoba no describen aspectos relacionados al manejo de la relación médico paciente cuando el paciente es un colega. El objetivo principal es describir estos aspectos. Material y métodos: Se realizó un estudio observacional, prospectivo, transversal y analítico. Se envió por email una encuesta validada a médicos de Córdoba, Argentina. Resultados: El 76% de los 225 médicos que respondieron la encuesta no tenía médico de cabecera. Los más jóvenes y quienes atienden en el ámbito público conformaron este grupo (p<0,0002 y p<0,04 respectivamente). El 86,2 % se automedicó en el último año. La automedicación fue más frecuente entre los jóvenes (p<0,0008) y con menos años de ejercicio profesional (p<0,003). Este grupo, independientemente de si trabajaban en ámbito público o privado, es el que siguió trabajando a pesar de cursar alguna patología y aunque podría haber solicitado una licencia por enfermedad. Los médicos de más edad (p<0,0002) y con más de 25 años de ejercicio profesional vivenciaron la asistencia a colegas (p<0,0002). El 74,2% no modificó la atención clínica, pero 82,7% respondió que alguna vez sí se comprometió más de lo habitual. Conclusión: Los médicos jóvenes no poseen médico de cabecera, recurren a automedicación, solicitan menos licencia por enfermedad, aunque la necesiten, y tienen poca experiencia para tratar colegas. Deberían incorporarse contenidos durante la formación de Medicina de grado y posgrado que aborden los riesgos de enfermedad y automedicación en médicos, cómo buscar el mejor cuidado para su propia salud y la del colega.

Sobrevida, eficacia y seguridad de Golimumab en pacientes con Artritis Reumatoidea y Espondiloartritis: Datos de una cohorte argentina / Survival, efficacy and safety of Golimumab in patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Spondyloarthritis: Data from an Argentine cohort

Objetivos: Golimumab ha sido aprobado para el tratamiento de pacientes con artritis reumatoidea (AR), artritis psoriásica (APs) y espondiloartritis axial. Sin embargo, los datos provenientes de nuestra región son escasos. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la eficacia, seguridad y sobrevida acumulada de golimumab en pacientes de la vida real con AR, APs y espondilitis anquilosante (EA) de diferentes centros de Argentina. Material y métodos: Se llevó a cabo un estudio longitudinal, en el que se incluyeron pacientes consecutivos mayores de 18 años con diagnóstico de AR (criterios ACR/EULAR 2010), APs (criterios CASPAR) y Espax (criterios ASAS 2009), que hayan iniciado tratamiento con golimumab de acuerdo a la indicación médica. Se obtuvieron los datos por revisión de historias clínicas. Se consignaron características sociodemográficas, clínicas, comorbilidades y tratamientos previos. Con respecto al golimumab, se registraron fecha de inicio, vía de administración y tratamientos concomitantes. Se determinó la actividad de la enfermedad mediante DAS28 en el caso de la AR, por DAPSA y MDA para APs y por BASDAI en el caso de Espax. Se consignó la presencia de eventos adversos (EA). En el caso de suspensión del tratamiento, se identificaron la fecha y motivo del mismo. Los pacientes fueron seguidos hasta la suspensión del golimumab, pérdida de seguimiento, muerte, o finalización del estudio (30 de noviembre de 2020). Resultados: Se incluyeron 182 pacientes, 116 con diagnóstico de AR, 30 con APs y 36 con Espax. La mayoría de ellos (70.9%) eran mujeres con una edad mediana (m) de 55 años (RIC 43.8-64) y una duración de la enfermedad m de 7 años (RIC 4-12.7) al inicio del tratamiento. El 34.6% de los mismos habían recibido al menos una droga modificadora de la enfermedad (DME) biológica (-b) o sintética dirigida (-sd) previamente. El seguimiento total fue de 318.1 pacientes/año. El tratamiento con golimumab mostró mejoría clínica en los tres grupos de pacientes. La incidencia de eventos adversos fue de 6.6 por 100 pacientes/año, siendo las infecciones las más frecuentes. Durante el seguimiento, 50 pacientes (27.5%) suspendieron golimumab, la causa más frecuente fue el fracaso del tratamiento (68%), seguida de la falta de cobertura (16%) y el desarrollo de eventos adversos (10%). La persistencia de golimumab fue del 76% y 68% a los 12 y 24 meses, respectivamente. Se registró una sobrevida de 50.2 meses (IC 95% 44.4-55.9). Los pacientes que habían recibido tratamiento previo con DME-b y/o -sd mostraron una menor sobrevida (HR 2.4, IC 95% 1.3-4.4). Conclusiones: El tratamiento con golimumab en pacientes de la vida real en Argentina ha demostrado una buena eficacia y seguridad. La sobrevida del fármaco fue de más de 4 años y casi el 80% seguía usando golimumab después de un año. El tratamiento previo con otros DME-b o -sd se asoció con una menor sobrevida al tratamiento.

Objectives: Golimumab is approved for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and axial spondyloarthritis. However, data from our region are scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and cumulative survival of golimumab in real-life patients with RA, PsA and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpa) from different rheumatology centers in Argentina. Material and methods: We performed a longitudinal study of consecutive adults with RA (ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria), PsA (CASPAR criteria) and axSpa (ASAS 2009 criteria), who have started treatment with golimumab according to medical indication. Data was obtained by review of medical records. Sociodemographic and clinical data, musculoskeletal manifestations, comorbidities and previous treatments were recorded. In reference to golimumab treatment, start date, route of administration and concomitant treatments were identified. Disease activity was assessed using DAS28 for RA patients, DAPSA and MDA for PsA and BASDAI for axSpa. The presence of adverse events was recorded. If golimumab was stopped, date and cause was documented. Patients were followed up until golimumab discontinuation, loss of follow-up, death, or study completion (November 30, 2020). Results: In total 182 patients were included, 116 with a diagnosis of RA, 30 with PsA and 36 with axSpa. Most of them (70.9%) were female with a median (m) age of 55 years (IQR 43.8-64) and m disease duration of 7 years (IQR 4-12.7) at treatment initiation. Al least one prior biological (-b) and/or targeted synthetic (-ts) disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) was received by 63 patients (34.6%). Total follow-up was 318.1 patients/year. Golimumab treatment showed clinical improvement in all three groups of patients. The incidence of AE was 6.6 per 100 patients/year, being infections the most frequents ones. During follow-up, 50 patients (27.5%) discontinued golimumab, the most frequent cause was treatment failure (68%), followed by lack of health insurance (16%) and adverse events (10%). Golimumab persistence was 76% and 68% at 12 and 24 months, respectively. Treatment survival was 50.2 months (95% CI 44.4-55.9). Patients who had received prior treatment with b- or ts-DMARDs showed lower survival (HR 2.41, 95% CI 1.3-4.4). Conclusions: Golimumab treatment in real life patients in Argentina has shown good efficacy and safety. Drug survival was over 4 years and almost 80% were still using golimumab after one year. Prior treatment with other b- or ts-DMARDs was associated with lower treatment survival.

Efficacy, Safety, and Immunogenicity of Biosimilar Etanercept (Enerceptan) Versus Its Original Form in Combination With Methotrexate in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Randomized, Multicenter, Evaluator-Blinded, Noninferiority Study.

BACKGROUND: Enerceptan (EtaBS) has been developed as a proposed biosimilar of etanercept. METHODS: This randomized, multicenter, evaluator-blinded, noninferiority study conducted in Argentina included adults with active, moderate, and severe rheumatoid arthritis with inadequate response to methotrexate. Subjects were randomly assigned to 32 weeks treatment with EtaBS (n = 99) or etanercept (n = 51) at a weekly 50-mg dose administered subcutaneously. Patients were categorized according to prior use of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and concomitant use of steroids. The primary efficacy endpoint was ACR20 response rate at week 32. Safety, immunogenicity, and steady-state concentration of both drugs were evaluated. The noninferiority margin for ACR20 was estimated at 12%. RESULTS: In the per-protocol population, 85 subjects (92.4%) treated with EtaBS and 44 subjects (93.6%) treated with etanercept achieved ACR20 (difference, -1.2%; 95% confidence interval, -10.1% to 7.6%). Frequent adverse drug reactions occurred in 34.3% and 38% of subjects treated with EtaBS and etanercept, respectively. The most common reaction was upper respiratory tract infection. Six and 3 serious adverse events occurred in 4 and 3 subjects treated with EtaBS and etanercept, respectively. Injection site reactions occurred in 67.7% and 66.0% of subjects treated with EtaBS and etanercept, respectively. Two subjects treated with EtaBS and 1 subject treated with etanercept developed antibodies by week 32. CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy outcomes for EtaBS were noninferior to original etanercept in patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis with inadequate response to methotrexate. Safety and immunogenicity results were comparable between the two. This study is a major step toward improving access to biologics in Latin America.

[Assisted fertilization with at term pregnancies in two patients with severe rheumatoid arthritis while in treatment with etanercept.] / Embarazos a término por fertilización asistida en dos pacientes con artritis reumatoidea severa en tratamiento con etanercept.

Introduction: There are numerous reports of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who became pregnant while on treatment with etanercept. In spite of being formally contraindicated during pregnancy and lactation its discontinuation in cases of women with severe RA is no longer recommended since an increase in congenital malformations nor perinatal complications has not been reported. There are few data on the success or failure of pregnancies achieved by assisted fertilization in patients with RA treated with etanercept. Methods: Two cases of severe RA under etanercept treatment and assisted fertilization are described. Results: After 4 failed attempts both patients became pregnant. They finally arrived at term without obstetric or perinatal complications. No congenital malformations nor infectious complications of the newborns occurred. Conclusion: The risk-benefit profile of etanercept in severe RA patients has been changing with postmarketing surveillance. If there is clinical indication, the benefit of not stopping etanercept during assited fertilization and pregnancy should be .evaluated.

Introducción: Existen numerosos reportes de pacientes con artritis reumatoidea (AR) que quedaron embarazadas mientras se encontraban en tratamiento con etanercept. Si bien se encuentra formalmente contraindicado durante embarazo y lactancia, su suspensión en casos de mujeres con AR severa ya no se aconseja debido a que no se ha reportado un aumento de malformaciones congénitas ni de complicaciones perinatales. Existen pocos datos acerca del éxito o fracaso de embarazos logrados por fertilización asistida en pacientes con AR en tratamiento con etanercept. Métodos: Se describen dos casos clínicos de pacientes con AR severa en tratamiento con etanercept que realizaron técnicas de fertilización in vitro. Resultados: Tras 4 intentos fallidos, ambas pacientes cursaron embarazos sin complicaciones obstétricas ni perinatales y no se registraron malformaciones congénitas ni complicaciones infectológicas en los recién nacidos. Conclusión: El perfil riesgo-beneficio de etanercept en pacientes con AR severa ha ido cambiando con la farmacovigilancia poscomercialización. Si existe indicación clínica, debe evaluarse el beneficio de no suspenderlo en el curso de tratamientos de fertilización asistida y embarazo.

Beneficio económico de los ensayos clínicos controlados patrocinados: El gasto evitable en medicamentos para el tratamiento de la artritis reumatoidea.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the following: (1) the avoidable cost of biologic (bDMARDs) and conventional synthetic Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) during controlled clinical trials (CCTs), their extension period, and for bDMARDs in post study drug programs; and (2) to evaluate the impact on health insurances. METHODS: We analyzed 13 CCTs (233 patients) that evaluated bDMARDs. Avoidable cost was what the health insurance should have paid if the patient had not received the medication from the CCT sponsor and was estimated with a micro-costing approach (bottom-up method). Results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or percentages. Approved by the Ethics Committee. RESULTS: Mean age was 50.62 SD 11.8 years, 84% were women, 72% (n = 166) had health insurance. The mean annual cost of bDMARDs was US$ 30 567.40 while the cost for csDMARDs was US$ 104.90 during the CCTs. The mean annual cost in extension periods and post study drug programs for bDMARDs was US$ 36 016.20 and for csDMARs during the extension period was US$ 81.70. The avoidable cost for public health insurances exceeded one million dollars per year. CONCLUSION: This work describes for the first time in Argentina the significant economic benefit that may represent for RA patients' health insurances the participation in CCTs with bDMARDs. It shows that during the execution of the CCT, its extension periods, or post study access programs, while medication provision is guaranteed, the economic burden imposed by the treatment of the RA is relieved.

Artritis reumatoidea asociada a colangitis biliar primaria bajo tratamiento con medicamentos biológicos. Reporte de 4 casos y puesta al día / Rheumatoid arthritis associated with primary biliary cholangitis under treatment with biological drugs. Report of 4 cases and update

El abordaje terapéutico de pacientes con dos o más enfermedades autoinmunes es un verdadero desafío, especialmente cuando el tratamiento enfocado en una de ellas podría precipitar la progresión de la otra. Si bien la asociación de artritis reumatoidea (AR) con colangitis biliar primaria (CBP) no es tan frecuente, cuando coexisten, la utilización de metotrexato u otras drogas hepatotóxicas debe decidirse con cautela. Con la indicación más generalizada de las drogas biológicas modificadoras del curso de la AR (DMARb) han aparecido algunos reportes de pacientes con AR y CBP tratados con etanercept, infliximab, rituximab, tocilizumab y abatacept. Presentamos una serie de casos de 4 pacientes con AR y CBP que fueron tratados con DMARb. Nuestro reporte sería el primero en describir dos casos con golimumab para controlar la AR y el segundo en reportar un caso con adalimumab y otro con abatacept. Con rituximab, ya existen tres casos publicados. En ninguno de los pacientes de nuestra serie empeoraron los síntomas de CBP y, al contrario, en dos de ellos hubo mejoría de los parámetros bioquímicos. En conclusión, según lo observado y lo reportado en la literatura, el uso DMARb podría ser considerado en el caso de pacientes con AR activa que además padecen CBP

The therapeutic approach of patients with two or more autoimmune diseases is quite a challenge, especially when the treatment of one of them, can precipitate the progression of the other. Even though the association of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is rare; when both coexist, the use of methotrexate and other hepatotoxic drugs should be used with caution. With a most widespread indication of biologic diseasemodifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) some reports of patients with RA and PBC treated with etanercept, infliximab, rituximab, tocilizumab and abatacept have been published. We report a case series that includes 4 patients with RA and PBC treated with bDMARDs. This is the first report to describe two cases in which golimumab was used to control RA and the second to report patients who received adalimumab and abatacept. Three cases of patients treated with rituximab have been published to date. None of the patients of our report suffered a progression of their PBC; matter in fact, two of them showed an improvement in their biochemical parameters. PBC symptoms did not get worse in any of the patients. On the contrary, laboratory parameters improved in two of the four patients. In conclusion, according to the literature reviewed and to our findings, the use of bDMARDs could be considered in RA patients with concomitant PBC

Effects of Amerindian Genetic Ancestry on Clinical Variables and Therapy in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To define whether Amerindian genetic ancestry correlates with clinical and therapeutic variables in admixed individuals with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) from Latin America. METHODS: Patients with RA (n = 1347) and healthy controls (n = 1012) from Argentina, Mexico, Chile, and Peru were included. Samples were genotyped for the Immunochip v1 using the Illumina platform. Clinical data were obtained through interviews or the clinical history. RESULTS: Percentage of Amerindian ancestry was comparable between cases and controls. Morning stiffness (p < 0.0001, OR 0.05), rheumatoid factor (RF; p < 0.0001, OR 0.22), radiographic changes (p < 0.0001, OR 0.05), and higher number of criteria were associated with lower Amerindian ancestry after Bonferroni correction. Higher Amerindian ancestry correlated only with weight loss (pBonferroni < 0.0001, OR 2.85). Increased Amerindian ancestry correlated with higher doses of azathioprine (p < 0.0001, OR 163.6) and sulfasalazine (p < 0.0001, OR 48.6), and inversely with methotrexate (p = 0.001, OR 0.35), leflunomide (p = 0.001, OR 0.16), and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (pBonferroni = 0.001, OR 0.37). Only the presence of RF and weight loss were modified after confounders adjustment. CONCLUSION: Amerindian ancestry protects against most major clinical criteria of RA, but regarding the association of RF with increased European ancestry, age, sex, and smoking are modifiers. Ancestry also correlates with the therapeutic profiles.

Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Golimumab in Methotrexate-Naive Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: Five-Year Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of golimumab through 5 years in adults with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had not previously received methotrexate (MTX). METHODS: In the GO-BEFORE study, 637 MTX-naive adult patients with active RA were randomized (1:1:1:1) to placebo + MTX (group 1), golimumab 100 mg + placebo (group 2), golimumab 50 mg + MTX (group 3), or golimumab 100 mg + MTX (group 4). Inadequate responders in groups 1, 2, and 3 entered early escape at week 28 to golimumab 50 mg + MTX, golimumab 100 mg + MTX, or golimumab 100 mg + MTX, respectively; remaining patients in group 1 could cross over to golimumab 50 mg + MTX at week 52. Assessments included the American College of Rheumatology 20%/50%/70% improvement criteria (ACR20/50/70) response, the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) using C-reactive protein (CRP) level, and the modified Sharp/van der Heijde score (SHS). Efficacy was analyzed using an intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis. Pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity were evaluated at selected visits. RESULTS: A total of 422 patients completed golimumab treatment through week 256. At week 256, 72.8%, 54.6%, and 38.0% of all patients in the full ITT population (n = 637) had an ACR20/50/70 response, respectively; 84.1% had a good or moderate DAS28-CRP response; and 72.7% had a clinically meaningful improvement in physical function. Radiographic progression was minimal in all treatment groups through week 256, and the overall mean change from baseline in SHS was 1.36. Serum trough golimumab concentrations were approximately dose proportional and maintained through week 256. Antibodies to golimumab occurred in 9.6% of patients through week 256. Infections were the most common type of adverse event (AE); 204 of 616 patients (33.1%) had ≥1 serious AE. CONCLUSION: Clinical efficacy with golimumab treatment was maintained through week 256 of the GO-BEFORE trial of MTX-naive RA patients. No unexpected AEs occurred; safety results through 5 years are consistent with earlier reports.

Golimumab, a human anti­tumor necrosis factor monoclonal antibody, injected subcutaneously every 4 weeks in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis who had never taken methotrexate: 1-year and 2-year clinical, radiologic, and physical function findings of a phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess 2-year golimumab efficacy/safety in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had never taken methotrexate (MTX). METHODS: RA patients who had never taken MTX (n = 637) were randomized (1:1:1:1) to placebo + MTX (group 1), golimumab 100 mg + placebo (group 2), golimumab 50 mg + MTX (group 3), or golimumab 100 mg + MTX (group 4) every 4 weeks. Nonresponders based on week 28 swollen/tender joint counts changed treatment as follows: group 1 added golimumab 50 mg, group 2 added MTX, group 3 increased golimumab to 100 mg, and group 4 had no change. Most group 1 patients (85%) initiated golimumab 50 mg + MTX at week 28 or subsequently at week 52. After the last patient completed week 52 and blinding was broken, the investigator could escalate golimumab to 100 mg and/or adjust MTX. The co­primary end points (week 24 American College of Rheumatology criteria for 50% improvement [ACR50] response and week 52 change in Sharp/van der Heijde score [SHS]) have been published previously. We now detail week 52 major secondary end points (Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ] disability index [DI] scores and SHS among patients with a baseline C-reactive protein [CRP] level >1.0 mg/dl) and week 104 findings. RESULTS: At week 52 for combined groups 3 and 4 versus group 1, the respective proportions of patients achieving ACR20 and ACR50 responses were 63.2% versus 51.9% (P = 0.017) and 45.3% versus 35.6% (P = 0.044). Respective week 52 mean HAQ DI improvements were 0.70 versus 0.58 (P = 0.053); mean SHS changes were 0.41 versus 1.37 (P = 0.006) among all patients and 0.74 versus 2.16 (P = 0.003) in patients with a CRP level >1.0 mg/dl. Improvements were maintained through week 104. Golimumab + MTX for 2 years yielded statistically less radiographic progression than initial MTX or golimumab 100 mg monotherapy. Golimumab safety profiles through weeks 24, 52, and 104 were generally consistent with those observed in other golimumab studies. CONCLUSION: In RA patients who had never taken MTX, up to 2 years of golimumab + MTX yielded sustained improvements in clinical signs/symptoms, physical function, and radiographic progression.

Rheumatoid arthritis in Latin Americans enriched for Amerindian ancestry is associated with loci in chromosomes 1, 12, and 13, and the HLA class II region.

OBJECTIVE: To identify susceptibility loci for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Latin American individuals with admixed European and Amerindian genetic ancestry. METHODS: Genotyping was performed in 1,475 patients with RA and 1,213 control subjects, using a customized BeadArray containing 196,524 markers covering loci previously associated with various autoimmune diseases. Principal components analysis (EigenSoft package) and Structure software were used to identify outliers and define the population substructure. REAP software was used to define cryptic relatedness and duplicates, and genetic association analyses were conducted using Plink statistical software. RESULTS: A strong genetic association between RA and the major histocompatibility complex region was observed, localized within BTNL2/DRA-DQB1- DQA2 (P = 7.6 × 10(-10) ), with 3 independent effects. We identified an association in the PLCH2-HES5-TNFRSF14-MMEL1 region of chromosome 1 (P = 9.77 × 10(-6) ), which was previously reported in Europeans, Asians, and Native Canadians. We identified one novel putative association in ENOX1 on chromosome 13 (P = 3.24 × 10(-7) ). Previously reported associations were observed in the current study, including PTPN22, SPRED2, STAT4, IRF5, CCL21, and IL2RA, although the significance was relatively moderate. Adjustment for Amerindian ancestry improved the association of a novel locus in chromosome 12 at C12orf30 (NAA25) (P = 3.9 × 10(-6) ). Associations with the HLA region, SPRED2, and PTPN22 improved in individuals positive for anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies. CONCLUSION: Our data define, for the first time, the contribution of Amerindian ancestry to the genetic architecture of RA in an admixed Latin American population by confirming the role of the HLA region and supporting the association with a locus in chromosome 1. In addition, we provide data for novel putative loci in chromosomes 12 and 13.

Evaluation of abatacept administered subcutaneously in adults with active rheumatoid arthritis: impact of withdrawal and reintroduction on immunogenicity, efficacy and safety (phase Iiib ALLOW study).

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of a temporary interruption in subcutaneous (SC) abatacept on immunogenicity, safety and efficacy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate in a phase III trial. METHODS: Following a 12-week open-label introduction (period I; intravenous abatacept loading dose and weekly fixed-dose SC abatacept 125 mg), patients were randomised 2:1 to double-blind SC placebo or SC abatacept for 12 weeks (period II). At the end of period II, patients receiving SC abatacept continued treatment and patients on placebo were reintroduced to SC abatacept (12-week open-label period III). The co-primary end points were ELISA-detected immunogenicity rate and safety at the end of period II. Efficacy was also monitored. RESULTS: Of 167 patients entering period I, 72% qualified for period II; during periods II and III, three patients discontinued treatment. Mean (SD) disease duration was 6.6 (6.5) years and Disease Activity Score 28 was 4.8 (0.8). The primary end point was met, with a non-significant increase in immunogenicity upon withdrawal (7/73 placebo vs 0/38 abatacept in period II; p=0.119) which was reversed upon reintroduction of SC abatacept (2/73 vs 1/38, end period III). Safety was comparable regardless of withdrawal, with no unexpected events upon reintroduction. Two patients experienced reactions at the SC injection site. On withdrawal, patients experienced slight worsening in efficacy which improved following reintroduction. CONCLUSIONS: Overall immunogenicity to SC abatacept is low, consistent with intravenous abatacept, and is not significantly affected by a 3-month interruption and reintroduction. This stop-start schedule was well tolerated, with little impact on safety and efficacy. These are important considerations for the clinical use of SC abatacept. CLINICALTRIALS: gov Identifier NCT00533897.

Golimumab, a human anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha monoclonal antibody, injected subcutaneously every four weeks in methotrexate-naive patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: twenty-four-week results of a phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of golimumab before methotrexate as first-line therapy for early-onset rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and efficacy of golimumab in methotrexate (MTX)-naive patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: MTX-naive patients with RA (n = 637) were randomized to receive placebo plus MTX (group 1), golimumab 100 mg plus placebo (group 2), golimumab 50 mg plus MTX (group 3), or golimumab 100 mg plus MTX (group 4). Subcutaneous injections of golimumab or placebo were administered every 4 weeks. The dosage of MTX/placebo capsules started at 10 mg/week and escalated to 20 mg/week. The primary end point, the proportion of patients meeting the American College of Rheumatology 50% improvement criteria (achieving an ACR50 response) at week 24, required significant differences between groups 3 and 4 combined (combined group) versus group 1 and significant differences in a pairwise comparison (group 3 or group 4 versus group 1). RESULTS: An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis of the ACR50 response at week 24 did not show a significant difference between the combined group and group 1 (38.4% and 29.4%, respectively; P=0.053), while a post hoc modified ITT analysis (excluding 3 untreated patients) of the ACR50 response showed statistically significant differences between the combined group and group 1 (38.5% versus 29.4%; P=0.049) and between group 3 (40.5%; P=0.038) but not group 4 (36.5%; P=0.177) and group 1. Group 2 was noninferior to group 1 for the ACR50 response at week 24 (33.1%; 95% confidence interval lower bound -5.2%; predefined delta value for noninferiority -10%). The combination of golimumab plus MTX demonstrated a significantly better response compared with placebo plus MTX in most other efficacy parameters, including response/remission according to the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints. Serious adverse events occurred in 7%, 3%, 6%, and 6% of patients in groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although the primary end point was not met, the modified ITT analysis of the primary end point and other prespecified efficacy measures demonstrated that the efficacy of golimumab plus MTX is better than, and the efficacy of golimumab alone is similar to, the efficacy of MTX alone in reducing RA signs and symptoms in MTX-naive patients, with no unexpected safety concerns.

Nodulosis pulmonar reumatoidea resistente a etanercep / Resistant rheumatoid lung Nodulosis etanercep

La nodulosis reumatoidea es una manifestacion extra-articular de la artritis reumatoidea (AR). El 20-30 por ciento de los pacientes con aR presentan nodulos, mas a menudo de localizacion subcutanea. La prevalencia de nodulos pulmonares es del 1 porciento o 22 porciento segun se evalue al paciente con radiografia o tomografia axial computada (TAC) de alta resolucion. Se desconoce cual es el mejor tratamiento de la nodulosis reumatoidea. Si bien la eficacia de los antagonistas del factor de necrosis tumoral alfa, sobre los sintomas articulares en pacientes con AR ha sido bien demostrada en diversos estudios clinicos y en la practica asistencial, la repuesta de la nodulosis reumatoidea frente a estos compuestos ha sido evaluada. Por otro lado, cuando la nodulosis reumatoidea pulmonar aparece o se cavita en un paciente tratado con meicamentos biologicos dirigido contra el factor de necrosis tumural alfa, es necesarios descartar diagnosticos diferenciales tales como infecciones oportunistas y cences.

Nodulosis pulmonar reumatoidea resistente a etanercep / Resistant rheumatoid lung Nodulosis etanercep

La nodulosis reumatoidea es una manifestacion extra-articular de la artritis reumatoidea (AR). El 20-30 por ciento de los pacientes con aR presentan nodulos, mas a menudo de localizacion subcutanea. La prevalencia de nodulos pulmonares es del 1 porciento o 22 porciento segun se evalue al paciente con radiografia o tomografia axial computada (TAC) de alta resolucion. Se desconoce cual es el mejor tratamiento de la nodulosis reumatoidea. Si bien la eficacia de los antagonistas del factor de necrosis tumoral alfa, sobre los sintomas articulares en pacientes con AR ha sido bien demostrada en diversos estudios clinicos y en la practica asistencial, la repuesta de la nodulosis reumatoidea frente a estos compuestos ha sido evaluada. Por otro lado, cuando la nodulosis reumatoidea pulmonar aparece o se cavita en un paciente tratado con meicamentos biologicos dirigido contra el factor de necrosis tumural alfa, es necesarios descartar diagnosticos diferenciales tales como infecciones oportunistas y cences.(AU)

Rate and causes of infliximab discontinuation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in a private clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the rate of infliximab discontinuation and the causes of this event in a population of rheumatoid arthritis patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Rheumatoid arthritis patients from an out-patient private center treated with infliximab (at least 2 consecutive doses) were retrospectively studied. The infliximab discontinuation rate was examined by the Kaplan-Meier survival method. Variables associated with infliximab discontinuation were analyzed by univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses. RESULTS: Seventy-seven patients treated with infliximab between August 2000 and December 2006 were identified; of them, 33 (43%) discontinued this drug. The cumulative discontinuation rate was of 23%, 35%, and 43% at 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively. Causes of discontinuation were drug-related adverse reactions (41%), financial constraints (15%), lack of efficacy (12%), and others (32%). Variables independently associated with infliximab discontinuation were the number of tender joints on an average during infliximab treatment [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-1.31; P = 0.005] and the occurrence of any adverse reaction attributed to infliximab (HR = 2.86, 95% CI 1.37-7.19; P = 0.026), whereas having full pharmacy coverage for infliximab (HR = 0.32, 95% CI 0.13-0.79, P = 0.014) was protective. CONCLUSION: Forty-three percent of patients discontinued infliximab at 3 years; most of them because of adverse reactions and financial constraints. Rheumatologists should be aware that those patients with more active disease were also at higher risk of discontinuing infliximab.

Lack of correlation between satisfaction and knowledge in clinical trials participants: a pilot study.

OBJECTIVES: To address participants' knowledge of informed consent and to explore whether knowledge level is related to clinical trial satisfaction. METHODS: One hundred and fourteen patients enrolled in three ongoing randomized controlled trials of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis were asked to complete a mailed form. The survey was related to aspects of the informed consent process: quality of information given during the informed consent process, participants' self perception of knowledge, objective evaluation of participants' knowledge and participants' overall trial satisfaction. These four aspects were categorized as high, intermediate or low. Correlation between participants' knowledge and satisfaction was measured using the Spearman's Rho test and variables associated with knowledge by standard univariable analyses. A p value< or =0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: One hundred and five participants answered the questionnaire. The quality of information given during the informed consent process was rated as being high by 81% participants, intermediate by 15.2% and low by 3.8%. Fifty-one percent of the participants believed they had a good level of knowledge, but, objective evaluation qualified as high in only 14.3% of them. Overall trial satisfaction was high in 95% of the participants. No significant correlation was found between knowledge and satisfaction (r=0.16; p=0.086). Age was negatively associated with a higher level of knowledge (48 vs. 58 years old, p=0.008). CONCLUSIONS: We found a lack of correlation between satisfaction and knowledge in clinical trials participants. During a randomized controlled trial the investigator should consider encouraging activities to improve not only participants' satisfaction, but also their level of knowledge.

Double-blinded infliximab dose escalation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of infliximab dose escalation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had an inadequate response to 3 mg/kg infliximab treatment or whose disease flared after initially responding. METHODS: Patients with active RA, despite receiving methotrexate, received infliximab 3 mg/kg at weeks 0, 2, 6 and 14 in one of the three arms of the START trial. Beginning at week 22, patients had their infliximab dose increased in a double-blind fashion in increments of 1.5 mg/kg if the total tender and swollen joint count did not improve by at least 20% from baseline (lack of response) or the improvement at week 22 or later worsened by 50% or more (criterion for flare). RESULTS: Of the 329 evaluable patients, 100 (30.4%) patients required dose escalation at or after week 22 because of flare or lack of response. The majority of patients (>80%) who received up to three dose escalations showed >/=20% improvement in the total tender and swollen joint count after their last dose escalation. Patients who required dose escalations generally had lower preinfusion serum infliximab concentrations than those who did not require them. The incidences of adverse events and serious adverse events for the patients who received dose escalation(s) were similar to those of patients who did not receive dose escalation. CONCLUSION: Fewer than one-third of patients required a dose escalation. The majority of patients showed improvement after receiving increased doses of infliximab, without an increased risk of adverse events.

Historia de la inhibición de la COX-2: entre la desconfianza del corazón y la tranquilidad del estómago / History of COX-2 inhibition: between heart distrust and stomach quietness

Una de las enseñanzas que dejó la controvertida historia de la inhibición de la COX-2 fue que la comunidad médica analizara con mayor conciencia los resultados obtenidos de ensayos clínicos. Los datos de los beneficios de la protección gastrointestinal contrapuestos al aumento del riesgo cardiovascular, han impreso un dinamismo enorme a la hipótesis COX-2 y el desarrollo de fármacos. Las investigaciones básica y clínica establecen día a día nuevos paradigmas. Mientras tanto, los pacientes que sufren patologías inflamatoriasdolorosas están siendo tratados por médicos que deben tomar decisiones que balanceen los riesgos que confiere cada droga